King Arthur 35 Sailboat Review, Specs, and Listings

Walter F. Rayner·1956
King Arthur 35 drawingBuilder drawing
Hull Type
Monohull · long
Rig
Masthead Sloop
LOA
35.5' · 10.82 m
Disp.
12,000 lbs · 5,443 kg
First year
1956

The mid1950s marked a pivotal moment in yacht design, as the sailing world began its transition toward lighter displacement, mass production, and modern racing rules. Amidst this changing tide, the expat Australian naval architect Walter F. Rayner, operating from his office in Poole, Dorset, stood firm with a highly conservative, classic British design philosophy. His response to the era was the King Arthur 35, an offshore cruising sloop first introduced to the public in the pages of Yachting Monthly in late 1954 and launched into production by 1956. Conceived as a premium, seaworthy passagemaker, the King Arthur 35 was built for the discerning sailor who demanded absolute safety and comfort in open blue water, standing as a stark alternative to the increasingly racingoriented designs of his contemporaries. Commanding a premium price at launch—a substantial sum for the mid1950s—it emphasized its highend positioning as a true aristocrat of the sea.

Measurements

Dimensions 01

Length Overall
35.5 ft
Length on deck
Waterline Length
25 ft
Beam
9.33 ft
Draft
5.25 ft
Maximum Headroom
Air Draft

Construction & hull 02

Construction
Wood
Hull Type
Monohull
Keel Type
Long
Rudder
1× Attached
Ballast
5,000 lbs (Lead)
Displacement
12,000 lbs
Water Capacity
Fuel Capacity

Rig & sails 03

Rigging Type
Masthead Sloop
Mainsail luff
Mainsail foot
Foretriangle height
Foretriangle base
Forestay Length (estimated)
Sail Area
554 sqft

Calculations 04

Sail Area to Displacement Ratio
16.91
Ballast to Displacement Ratio
41.67
Displacement to Length Ratio
342.86
Comfort Ratio
33.64
Capsize Screening Ratio
1.63
Hull Speed
6.7 kn

Design Brief & Intent

Designed during the golden age of traditional wooden yacht building, the King Arthur 35 was constructed to demanding custom standards. Rayner’s design was not built on an assembly line; instead, hulls were laid down by highly regarded shipwrights, such as Frederick Mitchell and Sons in Poole, or built under commission in the Far East. It was common for British and Australian expatriates and colonial civil servants of the era to take advantage of low-cost, highly skilled labor and exceptional local timber in places like Burma and Hong Kong. Hulls like the sister ship Hintha, built in Rangoon, were custom built by master shipwrights using premium Burmese teak for the planking, laid over robust timber frames. Inside, the cabin featured a classic sea-going layout, with rich mahogany or teak joinery, bronze fittings, and deep, secure berths designed to be usable at sea. This premium wood fit-out and robust construction separated the King Arthur 35 from competing production boats of the era, offering a level of longevity and aesthetic warmth that modern materials could not replicate.

Sailing Performance & Handling

With a displacement-to-length ratio of 342.86, the King Arthur 35 is a heavy cruiser of the traditional school. It relies on its substantial displacement of twelve thousand pounds and a generous ballast-to-displacement ratio of 41.67 percent to stand up to a breeze. The physical implication of this design is a highly stable, reassuringly stiff ride. It does not lay over easily in a gust; rather, it shoulders aside the seas with a powerful, momentum-driven motion.

Its motion comfort ratio of 33.64 guarantees a gentle, easy-going ride. This high comfort rating indicates that the boat's motion in a seaway is slow and predictable, which significantly reduces crew fatigue on long passages—a critical factor in bluewater cruising. Further supporting its offshore credentials is a capsize screening ratio of 1.63, well below the standard threshold of two, proving that the hull possesses immense reserve buoyancy and exceptional self-righting characteristics should it ever encounter extreme ocean conditions.

At the same time, the sail area-to-displacement ratio of 16.91 reveals that despite her heavy displacement, the King Arthur 35 is not sluggish. Rayner drew a balanced masthead sloop rig that provides enough sail area to drive the hull efficiently in moderate winds. Under sail, the boat tracks exceptionally well, thanks to its deep, long keel drawing over five feet. Helming is a balanced, hands-off experience once the sails are trimmed. However, the trade-off of this long-keel configuration is felt in tight quarters; maneuvering under power in a modern, crowded marina requires patience, forward planning, and a mastery of prop walk.

Classic Wood Construction & Triage

As a classic wooden yacht from the mid-1950s, the primary challenges of owning a King Arthur 35 center around traditional timber shipwrightry. Unlike fiberglass boats, a wooden hull requires constant, vigilant maintenance of its planking, frames, and fasteners.

The first area of concern is the fastening of the planks to the frames. Whether constructed of teak or mahogany on oak, the original fasteners—often bronze screws or copper roves—can suffer from fatigue or corrosion over the decades. A comprehensive survey should always include pulling a selection of fasteners to check for de-zincification in bronze or waste in copper.

Another critical structural zone is the ballast keel connection. The King Arthur 35 carries five thousand pounds of lead ballast bolted to the timber keel. The keel bolts must be periodically inspected and, if necessary, replaced. In many yachts of this era, iron or mild steel keel bolts were used, which inevitably rust and expand, causing split wood in the keel timber. Upgrading to bronze or Monel keel bolts is a standard, albeit labor-intensive, restoration task.

Sellers and buyers must also watch out for freshwater rot in the deck and cabin trunk. Rayner's designs often featured canvas-covered marine plywood decks or teak laid over a plywood sub-deck. If water penetrates the seams of the teak or the edges of the canvas, the underlying plywood will rot. Inspecting the deck-to-hull joint, the chainplate penetrations, and the coachroof corners is vital. Soft spots in these areas demand immediate surgical replacement of the affected timber to prevent structural degradation.

Modernization & Restoration Upgrades

Veteran owners of the King Arthur 35 are increasingly focusing on modernizing the vessel's systems to make long-term cruising more manageable while respecting her heritage.

The original auxiliary engine—often a twenty-four-horsepower Parsons petrol engine or similar mid-century diesel—is a primary candidate for replacement. Modern owners frequently repower with a lightweight, reliable diesel engine of comparable or slightly higher horsepower, such as a Beta Marine or Yanmar, which fits well into the deep bilge space and provides much more reliable power-to-weight efficiency. Some owners have also explored electric propulsion conversions; the heavy displacement and deep hull of the King Arthur 35 provide ample space for large lithium battery banks, making a high-voltage electric motor a viable option for those who primarily use the auxiliary for harbor maneuvering and short calms.

Electrical systems are usually entirely replaced during a modern refit. Original wiring was often minimal and lacked proper grounding and overcurrent protection by modern standards. Installing a modern marine electrical panel, high-output alternators, and a lithium iron phosphate battery bank allows owners to run modern navigation suites, refrigeration, and even watermakers.

Rigging upgrades are also common. While keeping the classic masthead sloop profile, many owners replace the original wooden spars with aluminum or carbon fiber masts to reduce weight aloft, which further improves stability. Upgrading to modern synthetic standing rigging offers the strength of steel wire with a fraction of the weight, and installing modern roller-furling headstays vastly simplifies shorthanded sail handling.

Market Snapshot & Economics

Due to their custom wooden construction and the niche appeal of mid-century classic yachts, the King Arthur 35 occupies a highly unique segment of the brokerage market. These boats rarely change hands on the open market, often being passed down through dedicated families of wooden boat enthusiasts or sold quietly within classic yacht registries. Because of this scarcity, they do not have a standardized market value, but rather trade based on the level of their ongoing maintenance and structural condition.

A pristine, well-restored hull constructed of Burmese teak can command a premium among traditionalists, while a project boat requiring extensive refastening, re-keeling, or deck rebuilding will trade at a deep discount, as the labor and material costs of professional shipwright services can quickly outpace the vessel's market value. For an owner with the skills to undertake traditional wood restoration, a King Arthur 35 represents an exceptional opportunity to acquire a robust, ocean-capable classic at a fraction of the cost of a modern fiberglass equivalent, provided they are committed to the lifetime labor of wooden boat stewardship.

The Verdict

For the sailor who looks at modern fiberglass production boats and sees a lack of soul, the King Arthur 35 is a captivating relic of a bygone era. It represents the pinnacle of mid-century British yacht design, combining Walter F. Rayner's legendary eye for sea-kindly lines with the unmatched warmth and longevity of premium timber construction. It is not a boat for everyone; the demands of wooden hull maintenance require a level of devotion, craftsmanship, and financial commitment that will deter those looking for a turn-key plastic cruiser. However, for those willing to act as stewards of maritime history, the reward is a remarkably solid, exceptionally comfortable, and staggeringly beautiful blue-water passagemaker that will turn heads in every harbor it enters.

Pros:

  • Seaworthy hull with exceptional motion-comfort in heavy seas.
  • High-quality timber construction, often utilizing premium Burmese teak.
  • Timeless, beautiful classic lines that command admiration in any harbor.
  • Highly stable and stiff under sail due to a generous ballast ratio.
  • Well-balanced masthead sloop rig providing respectable performance for its class.

Cons:

  • Demands high and continuous maintenance typical of wooden vessels.
  • Difficult tight-quarters maneuvering under power due to the long keel.
  • Vulnerability to deck and coachroof rot if freshwater leaks are ignored.
  • Keel bolt and fastener degradation require expensive or labor-intensive triage over time.
  • Limited interior volume and beam compared to modern cruising designs of similar length.

Similar sailboats

12 comparable designs · similar LOA, displacement & rig