Comet 1050 Information, Review, Specs

Make
Comet
Model
1050
Builder
Costruzioni Marittime Comar
Designer
Groupe Finot
Number Built
Production Year(s)
1983 - ??

The Comet 1050 represents a pivotal moment for Comar Yachts, bridging the gap between the experimental racing-oriented designs of the 1970s and the sophisticated performance-cruisers that would define the shipyard's output in the late 1980s and 1990s. Launched in 1983 and remaining in production until roughly 1990, the 1050 was a signature collaboration with Groupe Finot, whose influence is immediately recognizable in the vessel's sleek, low-profile coachroof and generous beam carried well aft. With approximately 180 units produced, the 1050 became one of the most successful "middle-weight" yachts in the Italian market, favored for its ability to balance the requirements of IOR (International Offshore Rule) era performance with the creature comforts demanded by the growing Mediterranean cruising class.

While it stands alone as a specific 34-foot model, the 1050 shares significant DNA with its "siblings" in the Comet range. It was essentially the successor to the earlier Comet 11 and 1000, refining the hull lines for better upwind efficiency. It also shared the production floor with the larger Comet 12 and the slightly later Comet 375 (a Peterson/Finot collaboration), which utilized similar vacuum lamination techniques that Comar pioneered during this era.

Sailing Performance & Handling

The Comet 1050 is characterized by Jean Marie Finot’s signature approach to stability: a wide beam and a relatively flat underwater profile. This design philosophy provides a high degree of initial stability, allowing the boat to remain upright longer under a full press of sail compared to narrower contemporaries. With a Displacement/Length (D/L) ratio typically situated in the moderate cruising range, the 1050 feels planted and secure in a seaway.

Owners and period reviews from Italian nautical publications like Bolina note that the 1050 excels in light to moderate air, a necessity for Mediterranean sailing. Its sail area-to-displacement ratio is generous enough to keep the boat moving when the wind drops below 10 knots, yet the hull shape prevents the "twitchiness" often associated with pure racing hulls of the early 80s. The steering is generally reported as balanced, though like many wide-stern designs of this period, it can become heavy on the helm if over-canvassed in a gust. The tracking is reliable, thanks to a well-profiled fin keel and a semi-balanced rudder on a partial skeg, providing a good compromise between maneuverability and directional stability.

Interior Comfort & Variations

For a 34-foot vessel designed in the early 1980s, the interior of the Comet 1050 was considered revolutionary for its spatial economy. Comar utilized the wide beam to create an expansive salon that feels significantly larger than those found on French or British competitors of the same length. The standard layout features a classic "L" or "U" shaped galley to port and a proper navigation station to starboard.

The use of warm teak joinery was a hallmark of Comar during this period, and the 1050's cabinetry often features the rounded edges and solid wood trim that denoted a higher tier of production quality. Most units were configured with a two-cabin layout: a V-berth forward and a surprisingly large aft cabin tucked under the cockpit on the port side. Variations existed primarily in the finishes and the evolution of the engine box insulation, as Comar refined the model's soundproofing throughout its seven-year production run. The headroom is particularly notable, exceeding six feet in the main salon, which remains a key selling point for taller sailors on the second-hand market.

Known Issues & Buyer’s Checklist

Prospective buyers of a Comet 1050 should focus their inspections on the specific construction methods used by Comar in the 1980s. While robust, these vessels are approaching their fourth decade of service.

  • Deck Core Integrity: Comar utilized balsa-cored sandwich construction for the decks to save weight. It is essential to check for "soft spots" around stanchion bases, the mast step, and chainplates, as moisture ingress can lead to delamination and core rot.
  • Grid and Keel Bolts: The 1050 uses an internal fiberglass grid to distribute mast and keel loads. Buyers should inspect the bilge area for any signs of cracking in the fiberglass tabbing where the grid meets the hull, which can indicate a previous hard grounding.
  • Osmotic Blistering: Like many Mediterranean builds of this era, the 1050 is known to be susceptible to osmosis if the hull was not treated with an epoxy barrier coat. A thorough hull inspection or moisture meter reading is recommended.
  • Original Engine Condition: Many 1050s were originally fitted with Bukh or Nanni diesels. While reliable, sourcing parts for older Bukh units can be challenging and expensive; check for the service history of the cooling system and heat exchanger.

Community & Resources

The Comet 1050 benefits from a dedicated following, particularly in Southern Europe. The primary hub for technical data and owner support is the Associazione Comet, an Italian-based owner's group that maintains archives of original brochures and technical drawings. While much of the technical discourse occurs in Italian, the community is generally welcoming to international owners seeking advice on restorations or specific hardware replacements.

The Verdict

The Comet 1050 remains a standout choice for sailors seeking an "Italian classic" that offers more interior volume and better light-air performance than the more common mass-production cruisers of the same vintage. It is a stylish, well-built vessel that reflects Comar’s commitment to quality before the industry shifted toward more aggressive cost-cutting measures.

Pros:

  • Exceptional interior volume and headroom for a 34-foot hull.
  • Strong performance in light-to-moderate wind conditions.
  • High-quality teak joinery and a "big boat" feel below deck.
  • Timeless aesthetic thanks to the sleek Groupe Finot design.

Cons:

  • Wide stern can lead to heavy helm pressure if the boat is not reefed early.
  • Balsa-cored decks require vigilant maintenance to prevent water ingress.
  • The original electrical systems and plumbing often require modernizing in unrestored examples.

Measurements

Construction & Hull

Construction Material
Fiberglass
Hull Type
Monohull Sailboat
Keel Type
Fin
Rudder
1x Spade
Ballast
3968 lbs (Iron)
Displacement
11023 lbs
Water Capacity
106 gal
Fuel Capacity
24 gal

Dimensions

Length Overall (LOA)
33.33 ft
Waterline Length (LWL)
28.3 ft
Beam
11 ft
Draft
5.9 ft
Max Headroom
-
Air Draft
-
Hover over a measurement
IJPE FS LOALWL

Rig & Sails

Rig Type
Masthead Sloop
P (Main Luff)
39.1 ft
E (Main Foot)
11 ft
I (Foretriangle Height)
48.33 ft
J (Foretriangle Base)
12.7 ft
Forestay Length (est)
49.97 ft
Sail Area
522 sqft

Calculations

Sail Area / Displacement (SA/D) Ratio
16.86
Ballast / Displacement Ratio
36
Displacement / Length Ratio (D/L) Ratio
217.12
Comfort Ratio
23.44
Capsize Screening Formula
1.98
Hull Speed
7.13 kn