Bristol 40 Sailboat Review, Specs, and Listings

Ted Hood·1970 – 1986·~149 hulls·Bristol Yachts
Bristol 40 drawingBuilder drawing
Hull Type
Monohull · full
Rig
Masthead Sloop
LOA
40.16' · 12.24 m
Disp.
17,580 lbs · 7,974 kg
First year
1970

The Bristol 40 stands as one of Ted Hood’s enduring cruising designs, built by Bristol Yachts in Bristol, Rhode Island, and conceived from the outset for bluewater passagemaking. Chesapeake Bay Magazine would later call it a high quality, solidly built boat that has withstood the test of time, and Cruising World ranked the B40 among its 40 alltime best monohulls. With about 150 built between the early 1970s and the final hull in 1986, the design drew on the same hull molds as the earlier Bristol 39 but carried a slightly longer overall length and, per the builder, somewhat fuller hull sections aft along with an altered stemhead fitting.

Measurements

Dimensions 01

Length Overall
40.16 ft
Length on deck
40 ft
Waterline Length
27.54 ft
Beam
10.75 ft
Draft
5.37 ft
Maximum Headroom
6.33 ft
Air Draft

Construction & hull 02

Construction
Fiberglass
Hull Type
Monohull
Keel Type
Full
Rudder
1× Attached
Ballast
6,500 lbs (Lead)
Displacement
17,580 lbs
Water Capacity
130 gal
Fuel Capacity
31 gal

Rig & sails 03

Rigging Type
Masthead Sloop
Mainsail luff
39.45 ft
Mainsail foot
16 ft
Foretriangle height
45.5 ft
Foretriangle base
14.58 ft
Forestay Length (estimated)
47.78 ft
Sail Area
694 sqft

Calculations 04

Sail Area to Displacement Ratio
16.42
Ballast to Displacement Ratio
36.97
Displacement to Length Ratio
375.73
Comfort Ratio
36.68
Capsize Screening Ratio
1.65
Hull Speed
7.03 kn

Design and Construction

The Bristol 40 reads as a traditional CCA-era cruiser-racer with prominent overhangs, a sweet sheer line, low freeboard, and an undistorted hull shape built around a narrow beam of 10 ft. 9 in. over a 27 ft. 6 in. waterline. Rather than a bolt-on external keel, the boat carries a molded keel cavity filled with 6,500 pounds of lead, and the hull itself is substantially lighter than most long-keel CCA 40-footers while still displacing around 17,000 pounds in measurement trim. Practical Sailor found the deck non-skid to be a molded-in basket weave pattern less effective than more aggressive designs, and noted that the colored gelcoat used was not colorfast. None of the owners surveyed reported any major structural flaws, though leaking ports, deck hardware, and hull/deck joints were common annoyances.

Rig and Handling

The rig is a basic masthead sloop or yawl, using an untapered, keel-stepped anodized mast with single spreaders and double lower shrouds, and a good number of Bristol 40s were completed as yawls. The mizzen makes the boat more tippy and adds windage that works against upwind performance. Owners report the Bristol 40 is very sensitive to the amount of sail carried, and in both keel and centerboard versions she is a fairly tippy boat owing to her narrow beam and shoal draft. The keel version loses positive righting moment at about 120 degrees, while the centerboard variant’s range of stability is closer to 110 degrees. Like most CCA boats she reaches well without the rounding-up tendency of fuller-sterned modern designs, but she tends to squat when running downwind, digging a hole that is hard to climb out of. A full-keel Bristol 40 won the 1983 Marion-Bermuda Race, a largely close-reaching event in light to moderate breeze. Handling in reverse is rated as poor by most owners.

Accommodations

As originally drawn, the Bristol 40 had a wide-open offshore racing interior with a sail locker forward and the head placed where a forward cabin would normally sit, but most boats were built with one of several more conventional layouts. Bristol made extensive use of mahogany rather than teak below, and in every layout except the original racing version the galley sits at the aft end of the main cabin. Headroom runs about 6 ft. 4 in. on centerline aft, dropping to roughly 6 ft. forward. The main cabin ports do not open. The cockpit is huge, with seats almost 7 ft. long, though its scuppers are too small and there is no bridgedeck—only a raised companionway sill—making quick cockpit drainage especially important.

Known Issues

The lower shroud chainplates do not line up exactly with the pull of the shrouds, a condition that will fatigue the chainplates over time. There is little room between the shaft coupling and the stuffing box, and several owners reported it is almost impossible to repack without removing the shaft. Early diesel-powered models carried black iron fuel tanks, at least one of which an owner had to replace after rusting out, while later boats received aluminum tanks that are less prone to corrode. When the switch was made to bigger diesels, the propeller aperture was not enlarged to match. The fuel tank sits under the cockpit sole above the engine in all models, and there is no sound insulation in the engine compartment.

Refits and Ownership

Later model 39s and Bristol 40s were powered either by the Atomic 4 gasoline engine or by a range of diesels including Westerbeke 4-91, 4-107, and 4-108, Perkins 4-108, and Volvo MD2B and MD3B. Access to the front of the engine is fair, requiring removal of the engine box front that also serves as the companionway ladder. One owner surveyed had added 1,500 lb. of lead pigs in the bilge to improve stability. Practical Sailor judged that because of her large cockpit, small drains, slightly vulnerable companionway, and low initial stability, the boat would not be a good choice for extended offshore cruising, even though she has completed many ocean crossings and is capable of taking you anywhere in the world.

The Verdict

The Bristol 40 is a stable and well-mannered traditional cruiser with a Hood pedigree and a proven record of ocean passages, yet she wears her CCA origins plainly in modest speed, tippy initial behavior, and details that demand a careful survey. She rewards an owner who reefs early and respects her drainage and chainplate limits.

Pros

  • Ted Hood design with blue-water intent and many ocean crossings to her name
  • Molded lead-keel cavity and solid construction with no reported major structural flaws
  • Huge cockpit and conventional, mahogany-trimmed interior layouts with good headroom
  • Strong reaching performance and a classic CCA profile

Cons

  • Lower shroud chainplates misaligned with shroud load, inviting fatigue
  • Tight stuffing-box access and unchanged prop aperture with larger diesels
  • Small cockpit scuppers, no bridgedeck, and non-opening main cabin ports
  • Poor reverse handling and tippy, squat-prone behavior off the wind

Similar sailboats

12 comparable designs · similar LOA, displacement & rig