Anderson 26 Sailboat Review, Specs, and Listings

Oliver Lee·1980 – 1982·~12 hulls·Anderson Rigden & Perkins
Approximate drawing

Hover a measurement to read its value

Hull Type
Monohull · lifting
Rig
Fractional Sloop
LOA
26.25' · 8 m
Disp.
4,419 lbs · 2,004 kg
First year
1980

The Anderson 26 is a small, slender fractional sloop designed by British maritime architect Oliver J. Lee in the early 1980s. Only a few were built. Its proportions and performance ratios place it toward the lightracer end of the spectrum rather than the cruising mainstream.

Measurements

Dimensions 01

Length Overall
26.25 ft
Length on deck
—
Waterline Length
22.97 ft
Beam
8.2 ft
Draft
5.91 ft
Maximum Headroom
—
Air Draft
—

Construction & hull 02

Construction
Fiberglass
Hull Type
Monohull
Keel Type
Lifting
Rudder
1× —
Ballast
— (Lead)
Displacement
4,419 lbs
Water Capacity
—
Fuel Capacity
—

Rig & sails 03

Rigging Type
Fractional Sloop
Mainsail luff
—
Mainsail foot
—
Foretriangle height
—
Foretriangle base
—
Forestay Length (estimated)
—
Sail Area
333 sqft

Calculations 04

Sail Area to Displacement Ratio
19.78
Ballast to Displacement Ratio
—
Displacement to Length Ratio
162.78
Comfort Ratio
17.28
Capsize Screening Ratio
2
Hull Speed
6.42 kn

Design and Construction

The Anderson 26 measures just over 26 feet overall, with an 8.2-foot beam and a displacement of about 4,419 pounds. Its solid-fiberglass hull has a length-to-beam ratio of 3.20, making it slimmer than 73% of comparable sailboat designs.

The boat carries a drop keel—a lifting keel that can be raised and lowered vertically—and has a variable draft of roughly 1.97 to 2.27 feet under load. This mechanism, paired with the slender hull, defines the design.

A displacement-length ratio of 163 puts the Anderson 26 in the “light racer” category; 79% of similar designs are rated heavier. Wetted surface is about 247 square feet, while the immersion rate is approximately 117 kg per centimeter of sinkage.

Rig and Handling

The fractional rig carries 333 square feet of sail. An SA/D ratio of 19.82 reflects a moderately powered sail plan on a light-displacement hull.

Period database analysis also lists sheet specifications that indicate the lengths of the control runs:

  • Mainsheet: 20 meters of 10 mm line
  • Jib and genoa sheets: 8 meters each of 10 mm line
  • Spinnaker sheets: 17.6 meters of 10 mm line

The theoretical hull speed is 6.4 knots. The boat’s Motion Comfort Ratio is 17.1, which the same analysis ranks as more comfortable than 34% of similar designs. That’s a modest result, but one consistent with a narrow racer.

Its capsize screening value is 2.00, a figure indicating that the boat wouldn’t be accepted for participation in ocean races.

Accommodations

The Anderson 26’s size and racer classification suggest a minimal camp-cruiser interior. However, no specific information has been published about berth count or tankage.

Known Issues

The main cautions are inherent in the boat’s type. The vertical lifting keel demands intact pivot and trunk geometry, while the 2.00 capsize screening value bars the boat from offshore racing rule compliance.

Refits and Ownership

Only a few Anderson 26s were built, with production concentrated in the early 1980s, so the ownership pool is tiny. Any refit calculation must allow for limited parts interchange and the custom nature of a low-volume lifting-keel design.

The simplicity of the fractional rig and solid-fiberglass hull keeps baseline maintenance ordinary. Specialist keel hardware is the area where the boat’s rarity becomes a particular drawback.

The Verdict

The Anderson 26 is an unusual boat: a slender, light-displacement lifting-keel sloop from a brief production run, designed for speed in sheltered water rather than passage-making. It suits a sailor who wants a low-draft racer and accepts the limitations of a 2.00 capsize screening value.

Pros

  • Slender hull, slimmer than 73% of similar designs
  • Vertical lifting keel providing 1.97–2.27 feet of variable draft
  • Light-racer D/L ratio of 163 and SA/D ratio of 19.82

Cons

  • Capsize screening value of 2.00 excludes ocean-race acceptance
  • Only a few boats built, with a sparse support network
  • Motion Comfort Ratio better than only 34% of comparable designs

Similar sailboats

12 comparable designs · similar LOA, displacement & rig