Hunter 40-1 — Information, Review, Specs

Cortland Steck·1984 – 1990·Hunter Marine
Hunter 40-1 drawingBuilder drawing
Hull type
Monohull · fin
Rig
Fractional Sloop
LOA
39.58' · 12.06 m
Displ.
17,400 lbs · 7,893 kg
First year
1984

The Hunter 401, produced between 1984 and 1991, represents a definitive era in American boat building where volume and value began to dominate the recreational market. As a standout model from the MarlowHunter archives, this vessel was designed to provide the accommodations of a much larger yacht within a manageable 40foot footprint. It was a departure from the narrower, more traditional lines of the previous decade, embracing a beamier hull form that maximized interior living space. This model served as a bridge between the early Cherubiniinfluenced designs and the later "Legend" series, incorporating the initial iterations of the B&R rig that would become a brand hallmark.

Measurements

Dimensions 01

LOA
39.58 ft
LWL
32.5 ft
Beam
13.42 ft
Draft
6.5 ft
Max headroom
-
Air draft
58.52 ft

Construction & hull 02

Construction
Fiberglass
Hull type
Monohull
Keel type
Fin
Rudder
1× Spade
Ballast
7900 lbs
Displacement
17400 lbs
Water
100 gal
Fuel
40 gal

Rig & sails 03

Rig type
Fractional Sloop
P · main luff
48 ft
E · main foot
13.75 ft
I · fore ht.
53.75 ft
J · fore base
17 ft
Forestay (est)
56.37 ft
Sail area
787 sqft

Calculations 04

SA/D ratio
18.75
Ballast/Disp.
45.4
D/L ratio
226.28
Comfort ratio
24.45
Capsize screening
2.07
Hull speed
7.64 kn

Sailing Performance & Handling

The Hunter 40-1 is characterized by its Bergstrom & Ridder (B&R) rig, a distinctive configuration featuring swept-back spreaders and no permanent backstay. This design allows for a larger, more powerful mainsail with a significant roach, which provides much of the boat's drive. While the lack of a backstay can be jarring to traditionalists, it simplifies tacking and allows for a more efficient sail plan in light to moderate winds. According to period editorial evaluations from Cruising World, the boat is notably "stiff" due to its generous beam and ballast-to-displacement ratio, which hovers around 40 percent.

Under sail, the 40-1 is a capable coastal cruiser that handles predictably. Its deep-draft version (6' 6") offers better upwind tracking and reduced leeway compared to the shoal-draft (5' 3") alternative, though the latter is far more common in the thin waters of the Chesapeake and the Bahamas. The boat's displacement of approximately 17,600 pounds provides enough mass to carry momentum through a chop, though its relatively flat sections forward can lead to occasional pounding when driven hard into a head sea. Owners often report that the boat "finds its groove" at about 15 knots of breeze, where the hull’s initial stability keeps the deck level and the helm balanced.

Interior Comfort & Variations

The interior of the Hunter 40-1 was a revelation at the time of its release, utilizing a "tri-cabin" layout that prioritized privacy for two couples. The master stateroom is located aft, featuring a large double berth and private access to the aft head—a luxury rarely seen in 40-footers of the mid-1980s. The forward V-berth is equally accommodating, often served by a second head in the forward companionway.

In the main salon, Hunter maximized the 13' 5" beam to create a social hub. A large, U-shaped settee to starboard surrounds a teak dining table, while the longitudinal galley to port offers expansive counter space and deep sinks, catering to those who spend weeks rather than days aboard. High-authority technical documents highlight the use of extensive teak joinery throughout the cabin, which provides a warmer, more traditional aesthetic than the more fiberglass-intensive interiors of Hunter’s later 1990s models. Sibling variations include a "charter version" which occasionally modified the stowage lockers to increase berth capacity, though the vast majority of the 40-1 fleet remains in the standard two-cabin, two-head configuration.

Known Issues & Buyer’s Checklist

Prospective buyers of a Hunter 40-1 should focus on several era-specific technical areas during their inspection. The most critical point of failure is often the "compression post" base. In many 1980s Hunters, the mast compression post sits on a wooden block in the bilge; if the bilge is allowed to stay wet, this block can rot, leading to structural settling and rig tension issues.

Another area for scrutiny is the "smiling" keel joint. This occurs when the forward edge of the keel-to-hull joint opens slightly, often due to the compression of the fiberglass laminate over decades of sailing. While often cosmetic, it requires a structural survey to ensure the keel bolts are secure and the internal grid is intact. Additionally, the Hunter 40-1 utilized an aluminum toe rail that is prone to leaking at the fastener points; buyers should check for water staining on the interior cabinetry behind the settees. Finally, because these boats often featured original Yanmar diesel engines, the mixing elbow and engine mounts should be checked for corrosion and fatigue, common in vessels of this vintage.

Community & Resources

The Hunter 40-1 benefits from one of the most robust owner support networks in the maritime world. The Hunter Owners Association (often found via the Marlow-Hunter technical portal) maintains an extensive database of user-submitted modifications and original parts lists. This community is particularly active in documenting "DIY" fixes for the B&R rig and sourcing replacement hatches or portlights that are no longer in production.

The Verdict

The Hunter 40-1 remains a formidable choice for budget-conscious cruisers who refuse to sacrifice interior volume. While it may not possess the offshore pedigree of a heavy-displacement cutter, its performance-to-comfort ratio is exceptionally high for the used market.

Pros:

  • Exceptional interior volume with a true master aft cabin.
  • Simplified sail handling via the B&R rig and large mainsail.
  • Strong secondary market support and parts availability.
  • Excellent value-to-length ratio compared to contemporary European builds.

Cons:

  • Vulnerable to "bilge rot" at the base of the mast compression post.
  • Shoal draft versions sacrifice significant upwind performance.
  • Flat forward sections can result in a noisy ride in heavy head seas.
  • Original aluminum toe rails are common sources of deck leaks.

Similar sailboats

12 comparable designs · similar LOA, displacement & rig