Ericson 36 — Information, Review, Specs

Ron Holland·1980 – 1984·~32 hulls·Ericson Yachts
Ericson 36 drawingBuilder drawing
Hull type
Monohull · fin
Rig
Masthead Sloop
LOA
35.58' · 10.84 m
Displ.
11,600 lbs · 5,262 kg
First year
1980

The Ericson 36, introduced in 1980, represents a pivotal moment in the evolution of Bruce King’s design philosophy for Ericson Yachts. While many of its predecessors were shaped by the constraints of the International Offshore Rule (IOR), the Ericson 36 was conceived as a highperformance cruiserracer that prioritized balanced handling and aesthetic grace over rulebeating hull distortions. This model is often recognized by its refined entry, a moderate beam that carries well aft without the "pinched" stern common to late1970s designs, and a powerful masthead rig. Built during the company’s tenure under the CML Group, the 36 was engineered to be stiff and durable, featuring the manufacturer's signature "Triaxial Force Grid" system—a fiberglass skeletal structure bonded to the hull to distribute rigging and keel loads.

Measurements

Dimensions 01

LOA
35.58 ft
LWL
29 ft
Beam
11.83 ft
Draft
6.25 ft
Max headroom
-
Air draft
-

Construction & hull 02

Construction
Fiberglass
Hull type
Monohull
Keel type
Fin
Rudder
1× Spade
Ballast
5230 lbs (Lead)
Displacement
11600 lbs
Water
70 gal
Fuel
50 gal

Rig & sails 03

Rig type
Masthead Sloop
P · main luff
42 ft
E · main foot
12 ft
I · fore ht.
47.75 ft
J · fore base
14.5 ft
Forestay (est)
49.9 ft
Sail area
599 sqft

Calculations 04

SA/D ratio
18.7
Ballast/Disp.
45.09
D/L ratio
212.33
Comfort ratio
21.55
Capsize screening
2.09
Hull speed
7.22 kn

Sailing Performance & Handling

The Ericson 36 is widely regarded as a "sailor’s boat," characterized by its responsiveness and ability to perform across a broad range of wind conditions. With a Displacement-to-Length (D/L) ratio of approximately 232 and a Sail Area-to-Displacement (SA/D) ratio in the 17.5 range, it sits firmly in the performance cruising category. In light air, the boat’s generous sail plan allows it to move efficiently, while its deep fin keel and high-aspect spade rudder provide the bite necessary for impressive upwind tracking.

Owners often report that the boat feels exceptionally balanced on the helm, a trait attributed to Bruce King’s move away from the extreme IOR shapes that caused many contemporary boats to become "squirrelly" when heeled. According to period performance reports, the 36 is notably "sea-kindly" in a chop, with enough displacement to avoid the pounding associated with lighter flat-bottomed designs, yet it remains fast enough to remain competitive in PHRF (Performance Hunter Racing Fleet) fleets, where it typically carries a rating between 108 and 114.

Interior Comfort & Variations

The interior of the Ericson 36 reflects the high standard of cabinetry that defined the builder’s "golden era." The layout is a classic offshore configuration, featuring a forward V-berth with ample hanging locker space, a main salon with a folding leaf table, and a dedicated navigation station to starboard. The use of rich teak joinery and a teak-and-holly sole creates a warm, traditional atmosphere that contrasts with the more utilitarian interiors of modern production boats.

A key variation to note is the distinction between the Bruce King Ericson 36 and its "siblings" built on similar or related hull platforms. While the standard 36 is the most common, Ericson also produced the Ericson 36C (Cutter), which is a fundamentally different vessel featuring a heavy-displacement hull, a full keel, and a traditional double-ended stern. Another sibling is the Ericson 36 RH, designed by Ron Holland, which was a more aggressive, race-oriented boat with a different deck mold and internal structure. Prospective buyers must distinguish the Bruce King 36—intended for performance cruising—from the heavy-duty cruising 36C or the racing-focused RH variant.

Known Issues & Buyer’s Checklist

While the Ericson 36 is fundamentally robust, three decades of service necessitate a specific inspection protocol for potential buyers.

  • The TAFG (Tri-axial Force Grid): Inspect the grid system for any signs of separation from the hull, particularly in the bilge area near the keel bolts. While the grid is a strength, hard groundings can cause stress fractures or delamination at the bond points.
  • Deck Core Integrity: Like many boats of this era, the Ericson 36 utilizes a balsa-cored deck. Moisture ingress around stanchion bases, the mast step, and cabin-top handrails is a common issue. A moisture meter or percussion "tap" test is essential to identify soft spots.
  • Chainplate Anchors: The chainplates are robust, but the sealant at the deck level can fail over time. Check the bulkheads below the chainplates for water staining or rot, as this can compromise the structural integrity of the rig tension.
  • Rudder Post Seepage: The spade rudder is supported by a bearing and stuffing box that may require repacking or replacement if steering feels stiff or if there is excessive weeping at the post.

Community & Resources

The Ericson 36 benefits from one of the most dedicated owner communities in the United States. The primary hub for technical data, original brochures, and maintenance wikis is the Ericson Yachts Owners Association, which hosts an extensive archive of Bruce King’s original design notes and factory specifications. This resource is vital for owners seeking to maintain the original performance profile of the vessel or source period-correct hardware.

The Verdict

The Ericson 36 remains a premier choice for the discerning sailor who values traditional aesthetics and sophisticated sailing dynamics over the maximum interior volume found in newer "condo-maran" style monohulls. It is a boat that rewards a skilled hand on the tiller and remains capable of both coastal racing and extended offshore passages.

Pros:

  • Excellent upwind performance and balanced handling.
  • High-quality interior finish with extensive use of teak.
  • Robust structural design featuring the Tri-axial Force Grid.
  • Strong resale value and an active, knowledgeable owner association.

Cons:

  • Balsa-cored decks are prone to moisture issues if not properly maintained.
  • The cockpit can feel narrow compared to modern wide-beam designs.
  • Engine access is somewhat restricted, making certain maintenance tasks difficult.

Similar sailboats

12 comparable designs · similar LOA, displacement & rig