Metalmast 36 Information, Review, Specs

History and Design

The Metalmast 36 began its production run in 1978. Designed by Peter Canning, who was also responsible for the Metalmast 30, the 36-footer represents an interesting, albeit minor, expansion of Metalmast Marine's business beyond its core expertise in spar manufacturing, 19]. Metalmast Marine itself was a pioneering force in the industry, starting in 1957 as one of the earliest global producers of aluminum spars, known for their strength, efficiency, and consistent manufacturing quality.

While specific design philosophies for Peter Canning's 1-Tonners are not extensively documented in public records, the "1 TON" designation suggests an adherence to the International Offshore Rule (IOR) rating system prevalent during that era, indicating a design optimized for racing performance within a specific handicap class. The hull features a fin keel and a spade rudder, a configuration typical of performance-oriented designs of the late 1970s, aimed at maximizing hydrodynamic efficiency and maneuverability. The hull itself is constructed from solid fiberglass, known for its durability and minimal maintenance requirements.

Sailing Performance and Handling

The Metalmast 36 is equipped with a masthead sloop rig, providing a substantial sail plan for its size. Its design ratios suggest a boat that balances spirited performance with inherent stability. With a Sail Area to Displacement (SA/D) ratio of approximately 17.17, the Metalmast 36 is indicative of a vessel capable of good performance, particularly in light to moderate wind conditions. This ratio suggests a boat that is relatively well-powered for its displacement, allowing it to accelerate and maintain speed effectively.

The Ballast to Displacement (B/D) ratio of 0.50 is remarkably high, signifying exceptional initial stability and stiffness. This high ballast ratio means the boat can stand up to its canvas effectively in stronger winds, providing a more upright and comfortable motion, and translating more wind energy directly into forward motion. Furthermore, with a Displacement to Length (D/L) ratio of approximately 230.18, the Metalmast 36 falls into the category of a medium-displacement performance cruiser. This suggests a design that aims to combine respectable speed and agile handling with enough volume and mass for comfortable cruising, rather than being an ultra-light displacement pure racer. While detailed anecdotal handling characteristics are scarce, the combination of a fin keel and spade rudder typically results in a boat that is responsive and relatively easy to maneuver.

Accommodations and Layout

While specific detailed interior layouts for the Metalmast 36 are not widely available in public specifications, its classification as a racer-cruiser and its approximate length of 35.45 feet suggest a functional and comfortable interior typical of boats of its era. Given the notes indicating its similarity to the Mariner 36, which has been described as an "affordable liveaboard cruiser," it is likely that the Metalmast 36 offers a layout suitable for extended stays onboard.

Common interior arrangements for vessels of this size and type from the late 1970s often include a V-berth forward, a main salon with settees that convert to berths, a galley, and an enclosed head. Quality of finish would typically involve a combination of fiberglass liners and wood trim, providing a robust yet somewhat warm aesthetic. Storage is usually integrated throughout the cabin, crucial for both cruising provisions and racing gear. Ventilation would rely on deck hatches and portlights, common for the period.

Owner's Perspectives

Owner feedback on the Metalmast 36, often overlapping with discussions about the Mariner 36, points to a generally positive experience with these vessels. Owners of the similar Mariner 36 have characterized their boats as "well maintained" and possessing "solid fiberglass hulls," underscoring their durable construction. While not explicitly stated for the Metalmast 36, the shared design lineage with the Mariner 36 suggests a similar reputation for robustness. Some discussions among Mariner owners touch upon individual maintenance challenges, such as issues with specific components or previous repair work. However, collective strengths consistently highlighted generally revolve around the boat's overall solid build and its suitability as a comfortable and capable cruising platform. The enduring appeal of these Peter Canning designs for both racing and cruising underscores their versatility and seaworthiness.