Catalina 400 Mk II Information, Review, Specs

The Catalina 400 was initially introduced in 1995, with the refined Mk II version beginning production in 2000. [14, Carrying forward Catalina's long-standing design philosophy of delivering practical, comfortable, and value-driven yachts, the 400 Mk II was conceived as a capable cruiser. The builder, Catalina Yachts, is known for its robust five-piece construction method, which includes a dedicated structural grid and a full molded fiberglass hull liner, ensuring durability and a common-sense approach to boat building.

The Mk II introduced several enhancements over its predecessor. Notable differences include independent steering systems for added redundancy and improved interior joinery, featuring wood cabinet doors in the Mk II compared to the gelcoat finishes found in the original 400. The design offers flexibility with a standard deep max draft of 6.92 feet, optimized for performance, and an optional wing keel version with a shallower draft of 5.33 feet and increased ballast, catering to those navigating shallower waters.

Sailing Performance and Handling

With a sail area to displacement ratio of approximately 17.78, the Catalina 400 Mk II demonstrates a respectable ability to perform well, even in lighter winds, while still possessing the sail-carrying capacity for more spirited conditions. Her ballast to displacement ratio of around 0.365 indicates a moderately stiff and stable vessel, capable of standing up to a decent breeze without excessive heeling. The displacement to length ratio of roughly 180.95 places her in the category of a relatively lighter, performance-oriented cruiser for her size, suggesting an efficient hull form that moves easily through the water. The boat boasts a theoretical hull speed of 8.1 knots.

Owners generally praise the Catalina 400 Mk II for sailing well, noting its responsive handling. It is often described as being lighter with more sail area relative to its waterline length compared to some counterparts, contributing to its performance characteristics. Many owners find the boat easy to single-hand, particularly when equipped with in-mast furling, and it performs admirably in winds below 20 knots. While designed and rated for open oceans, some owners have noted a tendency for prop-walk in reverse, a common characteristic in many boats.

Accommodations and Layout

The interior of the Catalina 400 Mk II is often lauded as exceptionally well-designed, offering a spacious and comfortable living environment. The layout typically features a dual helm cockpit, which enhances deck space and maneuverability. Below deck, the design prioritizes livability, featuring a generous aft cabin, a secure U-shaped galley, and two heads, often including an enclosed shower. The Mk II further distinguishes itself with improved interior joinery, utilizing wood cabinet doors that contribute to a more refined finish.

The Catalina 400 Mk II was available in both two-cabin and three-cabin configurations, providing flexibility for different owner needs. General interior arrangements commonly include a comfortable V-berth in the forward cabin, a well-appointed salon, and ample storage throughout. The cabin top and bow area are designed to be open and clear, providing generous space for lounging and relaxation.

Owner's Perspectives

Owners of the Catalina 400 Mk II consistently express satisfaction with their vessels, often praising its robust build and comfortable motion in a seaway, attributes that make it suitable for extended cruising and even living aboard. The Yanmar engine, a common installation, is frequently highlighted as reliable and powerful. The ease of handling, especially when single-handed with features like in-mast furling, is a significant advantage noted by many.

However, some owners have reported recurring issues. Concerns occasionally arise regarding the standard deep draft of the keel, which can limit access to shallower anchorages. The aforementioned prop-walk in reverse is also a common point of discussion. Some earlier models, or specific manufacturing runs, have been cited for developing leaky deck fittings, necessitating attention for re-bedding, though the Mk II aimed to address and improve upon such aspects.